“Colour adds new layers of meaning to famous figures usually viewed in black and white. They become more human, not always in a nice way.”
Before photography, portraits of famous people were in colour and after the 1960’s most photographic portraits also. However, the period in between generally was a black and white portrait era. If we think back to the images of the two world wars, it is almost the case that we view this era in black and white.
The authors of the book Maral (an artist) and Jones have chosen 200 image depicting key events and people to work with. Gerard DeGroot of The Times argues that a 1922 portrait of Hitler “renders him appropriately ridiculous.”
DeGroot goes on:
I have long considered colourisation, rather like adding a Formica Top to an antique mahogany desk. However, after reading this book, I’ve changed my mind. In colour, Kaiser Wilhelm looks even more a fool, exposing the enormous vanity of a mediocre man.”
However, photographers, myself included still use monochrome and with purpose. Colour can be an overpowering element of design. Working in monochrome gives other elements – such as texture, shape and form space to breathe and be taken in. Colour can distract and monochrome helps to focus on the key message in the image. Certain individuals, such as John D Rockefeller, DeGroot argues, succumbs to a sense of vulnerability hidden in black and white. On the other hand Stalin does not seem sufficiently evil in colour.
DeGroot finishes with an image that does improve with colourisation. The Wright brothers flying a glider needs a blue sky backdrop and the colour adds to the sense of the event in a way black and white could not.
So, there are pros and cons to both black and white and colour images, which only serves to remind me that having a choice at the processing stage is important, and may not be a judgement that can necessarily be made at the point of capture. This article has been really helpful in suggesting that monochrome is not always best and I should remain open to the use of colour, where appropriate, and where the image or mood might be enhanced in this way.
DeGroot, G, The Colour of Time, The Times, 4 August 2018
Very good exposè of the pros and cons of each. Perhaps colour for character and b&w for mood?
Many thanks for your comment. Yes, I agree, colour for character and monochrome for mood which I think supports my black and white decision in my imagery!
It has been said (by whom and when I know not) that if you photograph a person in black and white then you photograph the person, if you photograph them in colour you photograph the clothes.
Indeed, I agree on this.
Brilliant. Many thanks for the link. As you know, I am fascinated by Antarctic exploration.