So how can Film Noir as a genre, or a particular aesthetic, be defined? The term is a cinematic term largely describing Hollywood crime dramas, often emphasising cynical attitudes and sexual motivations, with the classic period in the 1940s and 50s.
Although Film Noir is often referred to as a genre it is also applied to a particular visual style. It can apply to various backdrops (many are set in an urban environment) but there are also films set in a rural location or on the open road. Similarly, the film genre itself is varied and includes gangster movies, gothic romance and those exposing social problems.
The aesthetics of film noir have their influence in German Expressionism of the 1910’s and 20’s and later in Italian Neorealism with the first film considered to be in the Classic period The Maltese Falcon (1941) followed by Key Largo (1948). In the 1960s and 1970s Neo-Noir reflected world issues including the Cold War and reflected the possibility of nuclear war. The violence was also more powerful and explicit. Examples of the time included Cape Fear (1962), The Manchurian Candidate (1962) and a homage to the classic period in Woody’s Allen’s Play it Again Sam (1972).
In terms of the identifying characteristics of Film Noir and their relevance to my photographic practice it is first necessary to define what the characteristics might be. The style of chiaroscuro (taken from Renaissance painting) suggests low-key lighting, stark contrast and dramatic shadows which all apply to some of my darker landscape images particularly of the Black Cuillin Hills. The tone of Film Noir also applies to my work. Robert Ottoson, a critic and filmmaker refers to the darkness of the genre saying it is “overwhelmingly black”. Similarly, Paul Schrader said “Film noir is defined by tone” a tone he perceived as hopeless and a Noir Analyst Foster Hirsch described noir as “the requisite hopeless tone.”
These are some still images from The Third Man demonstrating some of the techniques of chiaroscuro:
My personal journey has a dark side to it and the images I hold in my head that I took in the early 1980s continue to haunt me. In my Research Proposal I said this:
“In this Research Project I will develop my photographic practice through a personal journey that involves death, darkness, hope and the emergence into light. It will reflect the silence that is always present at the scene of violent crime – the traces of humanity, intensely vulnerable and rendered insignificant by the events and forces around them.”
Although I do not necessarily intend to portray a sense of pessimism in my work I can see that some of my images are “dark” and foreboding in tone. This similarity with the Film Noir aesthetic was not intentional however I can see that some of my photographs have a haunting thriller-esque feel such as the images from my Work in Progress portfolio below:
I do believe that Film Noir will have some influence in my image making moving forward and I will view some more of the films of this genre to see how cinematography is used to create mood and tension in this format.
I went to see “The Eyes of Orson Welles” on Monday. While it felt more like an over-ambitious undergraduate project in itself, I think it could be a useful link to your film noire ideas. The documentary explores his use of camera angles and direction of movement among many other things. Well worth a couple of hours, at least, for background material.
Many thanks for your comment. I am in the throes of the final push to submit my assessed work at the moment but will look forward to watching the documentary between modules. Thanks again for the reference.